COVID-19 related biliary injury: A review of recent literature.

Since its emergence in 2019, it has become apparent that coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) infection can result in multi systemic involvement. In addition to pulmonary symptoms, hepatobiliary involvement has been widely reported. Extent of hepatic involvement ranges from minor elevation in liver function tests (LFTs) to significant hepatocellular or cholestatic injury. In majority of cases, resolution of hepatic injury or improvement in LFTs is noted as patients recover from COVID-19 infection. However, severe biliary tract injury progressing to liver failure has been reported in patients requiring prolonged intensive care unit stay or mechanical ventilation. Due to the timing of its presentation, this form of progressive cholestatic injury has been referred to as COVID-19 cholangiopathy or post-COVID-19 cholangiopathy, and can result in devastating consequences for patients. COVID-19 cholangiopathy is recognized by dramatic elevation in serum alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin and radiologic evidence of bile duct injury. Cholangiopathy in COVID-19 occurs weeks to months after the initial infection and during the recovery phase. Imaging findings and pathology often resemble bile duct injury associated with primary or secondary sclerosing cholangitis. Etiology of COVID-19 cholangiopathy is unclear. Several mechanisms have been proposed, including direct cholangiocyte injury, vascular compromise, and cytokine release syndromes. This review summarizes existing data on COVID-19 cholangiopathy, including reported cases in the literature, proposed pathophysiology, diagnostic testing, and long-term implications.

Demographic and clinical profile of patients suffering prolonged severe hypoxia in COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may result in rapid onset of hypoxemic respiratory failure. This study aimed to characterize the factors and outcomes associated with prolonged hypoxia in patients with COVID-19. Prolonged severe hypoxia (PSH) was defined as hypoxia requiring ≥6 L/min of oxygen by nasal cannula or equivalent for more than 10 days. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This study was designed as a single-center retrospective analysis. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized to assess factors associated with PSH. RESULTS: The sample included 554 patients with 117 (21%) having PSH. Median length of stay of patients with PSH was significantly longer (median IQR: 18 days vs 6 days, p < 0.0001). Patients with PSH had significantly higher rates of venous thromboembolism (p < 0.0001) and major bleeding (p < 0.004). The presence of cirrhosis (OR 3.32, 95% CI [1.02 to 10.83]) and hypertension (OR 1.99, 95% CI [1.12 to 3.53]) were independently associated with PSH, while outpatient use of anti-platelet agents had an inverse association (OR 0.57, 95% CI [0.36 to 0.91]). CONCLUSION: PSH is associated with increased length of stay, morbidity, and mortality. Hypertension and liver cirrhosis were significantly associated with higher odds of PSH, while use of anti-platelet therapy had a protective effect.

Coronavirus disease-19 infection and angioedema in African Americans: A case series.

Rationale: Few case series have described the simultaneous development of angioedema in patients with coronavirus 19 disease (COVID-19). Most of these reports were described in at-risk patients for developing bradykinin angioedema. Therefore, we aim to describe 5 African American patients who developed simultaneous COVID-19 and angioedema. Methods: This was a case series of hospitalized patients with simultaneous angioedema and COVID-19 infection in a single center from May 2020 to February 2022. We used descriptive statistics. The study was approved by the institutional review board. Results: Their median age was 55 years (range 28-66); all patients were African American, and 3/5 were males. All patients developed angioedema within a week of hospitalization. Two subjects had prior history of ACEI-related angioedema but were not exposed to ACEI recently, whereas 1 subject was on chronic lisinopril therapy for the last 3 years. All patients had orofacial involvement; the most common locations were lips (5/5) and tongue (3/5). None had histaminergic features of angioedema (either skin rash or peripheral eosinophilia). 4/5 subjects had respiratory symptoms and chest imaging features of COVID-19 pneumonia, whereas 3/5 subjects developed severe COVID-19 infection. Most patients were treated with standard combination of H1 and H2 blockers, and corticosteroids. A total of 2/5 subjects were intubated; one patient developed refractory tongue swelling, received tracheostomy for extubation, and died due to COVID-19 pneumonia. The median length of angioedema improvement was 44 hours (range 20-168 hours). The median length of hospital stay was 15 days (range 1-49). Conclusion: We described 5 cases of angioedema in COVID-19 patients that shared risk factors and features of bradykinin-related angioedema.

Examining the Rate of Clostridioides (Formerly Clostridium) Difficile Infection Pre- and Post-COVID-19 Pandemic: An Institutional Review.

Background/ Rationale Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is transmitted via the fecal-oral route and is implicated in antibiotic-associated colitis. Similar to CDI, patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) require early identification and isolation, appropriate personal protective equipment, and environmental disinfection to prevent further transmission. In light of this similarity between isolation and protective requirements to prevent transmission of these diseases, we aim to investigate whether there was a decrease in the incidence of CDI during the peak periods of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to historical rates. Methods This is a single-center retrospective analysis of the rates of CDI in our institution. COVID-19 time periods were identified from March 2020 to January 2021 and peak periods (with >50 active patients per day) were defined. The non-COVID-19 periods were July 2017 to February 2020. Rates of CDI were also directly compared across the yearly time period. CDI rates were presented in a per 1000 patient days format. Rates were analyzed per year and during the COVID-19 peaks at our institution. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare rates between two time periods, while differences across multiple time intervals were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results The median (interquartile range [IQR]) of CDI rates of infection per 1000 patient days for the non-COVID time period from July 2017 to February 2020 was 0.34 (0.23-0.45) while COVID time periods had higher 0.44 (0.25-0.51) rates of CDI although this was not statistically significant (p=0.224). However, there was a statistically significant difference (p=0.036) with COVID peak periods having higher rates of CDI 0.49(0.39-0.74) vs 0.34(0.23-0.44). Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in the rates of CDI across years or time periods (p=0.396). Discussion/Conclusion There was no difference in the rates of hospital-acquired CDI between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 time periods at our institution.

Comparison of Patient Clinical characteristics and Outcomes Between Different COVID-19 Peak Periods: A Single Center Retrospective Propensity Matched Analysis.

Introduction While Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) specific treatments have been instituted, overall mortality rates among hospitalized patients remain significant. Our study aimed to evaluate patient clinical characteristics and outcomes comparing the different COVID-19 infection peak periods. Methods This is a retrospective study of all adult patients hospitalized with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 between March 1 to April 24, 2020 and November 1 to December 31, 2020, which corresponded to the first and second waves of COVID-19 infection in our institution, respectively. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients were compared and used for propensity matching. Clinical outcomes, such as need for intubation, renal replacement therapy and inpatient mortality were subsequently compared between the two groups. Results Patients in the second COVID-19 wave had a significantly higher body mass index (32.58 vs 29.83, p <0.001), as well as prevalence of asthma (14% vs 8%, p=0.019) and chronic kidney disease (42% vs 18%, p <0.001). Almost all patients in the second COVID-19 wave received corticosteroid treatment (99% vs 30%, p <0.001), and significantly more patients received remdesivir (43% vs 2%, p <0.001). Meanwhile, none of the patients in the second COVID-19 wave were treated with tocilizumab or hydroxychloroquine. Differences in clinical outcomes, such as need for renal replacement therapy or intubation, and median length of stay were not statistically significant. Inpatient mortality remained largely unchanged between the two COVID-19 peak periods. Discussion/ Conclusion In our institution, after propensity matched analysis, clinical outcomes such as need for renal replacement therapy, intubation and inpatient mortality remained unchanged between the two COVID-19 peak periods.